StopLegalBullying.com  ·  Victim Outreach Initiative  ·  Anne Ashby — AAA Arbitrator
Public Interest Investigation

Were You Blindsided
by Anne Ashby?

If Anne Ashby served as your arbitrator — and the process felt rigged, one-sided, or compromised — you may not be alone. We are gathering accounts from other arbitration parties who experienced similar conduct.

Tell Us What Happened
This page presents allegations based on formal bar complaints and investigative findings. All claims are alleged and have not been adjudicated. This is not legal advice.
Background

Who Is Anne Ashby?

Anne Ashby (Texas Bar No. 15402600) is a Dallas-based attorney and AAA arbitrator who served as sole arbitrator in a multi-million dollar attorney fee dispute arising from the Allison family estate. A formal disciplinary complaint was submitted to the Texas State Bar in April 2026 documenting a pattern of alleged misconduct during that proceeding.

The complaint documents that Ashby signed an Arbitrator Oath certifying no conflicts of interest — then presided over a proceeding involving parties tied to her own longstanding professional network, allegedly without ever disclosing the full depth of those relationships. Michael Collins, a central figure in the underlying dispute, reportedly had a 35–40 year personal, professional, and financial relationship with Ashby — disclosed only in fragments, months after her appointment.

The arbitration was not neutral. The record shows a pattern of undisclosed relationships, financial dependency, and interconnected actors that created a clear appearance of evident partiality.


Ten Serious Violations
Documented in the Bar Complaint

01
False Oath
Swore "No conflicts" while concealing a 35–40 year personal, financial, and professional relationship with a central figure in the dispute.
02
Delayed Disclosures
Material relationships disclosed only after appointment, months into the case — too late for meaningful objection or recusal.
03
Exceeding Authority
Issued freeze orders and liquidation demands against non-party trust accounts and entities never bound by the arbitration agreement.
04
No Written Contract
Awarded ~$600,000 to an attorney with no written contingency fee agreement, in violation of Texas law requiring signed contracts.
05
Inflated Damages
Backdated prejudgment interest to a date that preceded any fee demand, accounting, or breach claim — materially inflating the award.
06
Blocked Expert Testimony
Refused live expert testimony from witnesses physically present and ready to testify, while allowing the opposing party's witness to testify.
07
Asymmetrical Rulings
Applied unequal evidentiary standards — restricting one side's evidence while imposing no comparable burden on the attorneys seeking fees.
08
Rubber-Stamp Award
Final award mirrored the attorneys' post-hearing brief word-for-word, adopting their legal theories wholesale with no independent analysis.
09
Financial Dependency
Allegedly hired by connected attorney immediately after filing Chapter 7 bankruptcy — a financial relationship never disclosed to the parties.
10
No Reasoned Decision
Despite a requirement for a reasoned award, summarily rejected all client claims with no meaningful legal explanation or analysis.
Recognition

Does This Sound Familiar?

The bar complaint against Ashby describes a pattern — not an isolated incident. Public reviews and anecdotal reports describe similar experiences from other arbitration parties. If any of the following occurred in your proceeding, we want to hear from you.

⚖️
Evidence excluded or testimony blocked
Your witnesses, experts, or exhibits were rejected without adequate legal justification.
🔗
Undisclosed relationships
You later discovered Ashby had ties to opposing counsel, experts, or parties that were never disclosed.
📋
Award that mirrored opposing brief
The final award appeared to adopt the other side's legal theories and damages without independent analysis.
🏦
Orders affecting non-parties
Ashby issued rulings affecting entities, trusts, or accounts that were never part of the arbitration.
⏱️
Late or fragmentary disclosures
Conflict disclosures arrived after appointment, after hearings began, or were minimized as routine familiarity.
💸
Damages that seemed legally unjustified
The award included fees, interest, or costs that exceeded what the law or the contract supported.

Why This Matters

Arbitration Is Final.
That's Why Neutrality Must Be Real.

When parties are compelled into arbitration, they surrender their right to a jury, to full judicial review, and to the procedural protections of a public courtroom. In exchange, they are promised a neutral decision-maker.

If that neutrality is compromised — through hidden relationships, financial entanglements, or procedural bias — there is almost no remedy. Vacating an arbitration award is extraordinarily difficult. The time to act is during the process, or through mechanisms like bar complaints, investigative journalism, and collective public documentation.

Your account matters. Every corroborating story strengthens the public record and may help future arbitration parties protect themselves.

Apr 7, 2026

Formal disciplinary complaint submitted to the Texas State Bar, Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel.

Mar 2026

Dolcefino Consulting releases two investigative videos documenting the arbitration irregularities.

May 1, 2025

Michael Collins reportedly confirms in a recorded interview a 35–40 year relationship with Ashby — directly contradicting her oath.

Jun 2024

Final award of approximately $4 million entered — adopting attorneys' theories wholesale. Later confirmed by court judgment.

Sept 30, 2022

Ashby signs Arbitrator Oath certifying "no conflicts" — the same day she began concealing her Collins relationship.

This investigation is active. A bar complaint has been filed. Investigative coverage is ongoing. If you have relevant information, now is the time to come forward.

Tell Us What Happened
in Your Arbitration

Your identity will be kept strictly confidential unless you choose to go public. We are building a documented record. All submissions are reviewed by the StopLegalBullying.com team.

🔒   Your submission is confidential. We do not share identifying information without your explicit consent.
This form is managed by StopLegalBullying.com · Not legal advice.

Thank You for Coming Forward

We have received your account. A member of the StopLegalBullying.com team will review it. Your identity remains confidential unless you indicated otherwise.

Resources

Learn More & Take Action

Watch the investigative videos, read the formal complaint, and follow the ongoing coverage.

🌐
⚖️